| (no subject) |
[Nov. 19th, 2007|08:14 pm] |
12 hour shifts suck goat's balls.
My new job, although it pays well, isn't great. After 2 days, I have effectively resigned. I do my last shift tomorrow.
I have more work waiting for me with another company which will be good.
My broadband is at dial-up speeds now. It's like there's someone on our network constantly downloading porn. It's annoying. |
|
|
| Today is another milestone in life |
[Nov. 10th, 2007|08:11 pm] |
Today I ceased being a teenager. 2 decades old. Wow.
Thanks to those who text'd me today. It means a lot to me.
It's funny how my own birthdays really don't excite me anymore. Although it's my own fault that I couldn't do any "birthday things" today, I am kinda disappointed. But anyway, it's good to have something new, even if it is just adding another integer to my age. :) |
|
|
| The problems with Republican models in Australia. (Beware - inherent Monarchist bias) |
[Oct. 30th, 2007|03:17 pm] |
There are a few different models for implementing an Australian Republic out there. For mine, all of them are lacking.
The Direct Election Model
Basically, the public elects a President to become a "figurehead" - a Head of State with no real powers. Either this, or the public elects a President with large executive power.
The problems: Who wants Krystal or Shane Warne as Head of State? You see, celebrities will have a lot more traction in the electorate than people who deserve to opportunity. Also, especially if the President were to have large executive powers, the position becomes partisan and not independent. This is a very bad thing - look at the United States and you can see what I mean. Any partisan head of state that can overrule the elected Parliament is definitely not better than we have now. In both instances of this model, the powers of the Prime Minister are changed.
The verdict: No good. This has an inherent possibility to become unstable.
The Bi-Partisan Appointment Model
The Prime Minister and the Leader of the Opposition both agree to an appointment of a President. Two thirds of Parliament need to agree to the appointment in a vote. The Presidential term is five years. The President can be sacked at any time by the Prime Minister. The President has similar reserve powers to the Sovereign and Governor-General.
The problems: In the event of a Government getting up to no good, and one that has a considerable majority of the Parliament (two thirds or thereabouts), the President can be dismissed and replaced by a President with an ulterior motive (ie supporting the Government) before the reserve powers can be used. There is some degradation of democratic essence.
The verdict: One of the better models of the lot. We democratically elect the Parliament, and so if we trust them with running the nation, we can trust them to select a half-decent President. Easy to implement, but I still don't think that it's any better than what we have now.
The McGarvie Model
A Constitutional Council determines the new President. The Council is made up of old Governor-Generals/Presidents, State Governors, High Court Judges, etc.
The problems: The Government still appoints High Court Judges, and former Governor-Generals. This can lead to selection of partisan Presidents. Not a democratic process, contrary to what seems like most Republicans want.
The verdict: Easily implemented, but it's still not much of a change. A change for a change's sake, so to speak. Still no better than what we currently have.
A Model Where the High Court Holds Powers to Dismiss a Government
The problems: Even though the High Court is filled with judges, who are supposed to be the pillar of our society, they are still appointed by the Government. This could lead to problems, again, with partisan issues. The process may also not be transparent.
The verdict: Still a possibility of rigging. Not an improvement on our current situation.
The Overall Verdict
What we have now works. The Prime Minister is responsible enough to recommend Governor-General appointments to the Sovereign. The Sovereign is highly independent and separate from the Parliamentary system of government. The Sovereign has supreme executive power that keeps the checks and balances, and precedence has shown the the Sovereign is unpartisan. As a result, we have one of the most stable constitutions and forms of government in the world. We are indeed lucky to have such a revered and sound institution as the Monarchy, and I am yet to see anything that will improve on this.
Our system of government is admired around the world. It is unique - it's different to Canada, the UK, New Zealand, the US and all other systems. What's more is that it WORKS.
It is estimated that any order of republican constitutional change will cost around AU$2 billion, and possibly more. Given the state of our hospitals, schools, infrastructure and our environment, I would leave mucking around with the Constitution until these are fixed. I also suspect that organisations with Royal patronage would not be quick to give that up. I for one am proud of the Crown that is a major part of this Nation.
Many Republicans base their views on Australia taking a step forward. From what I have seen thus far, we would only be taking a step backwards.
Please note that all of the above is purely opinion, and is not meant to be intended as a comprehensive guide for Constitutional reform. |
|
|
| See this film |
[Oct. 18th, 2007|03:28 pm] |
|
Go and see "A Death at a Funeral", directed by Frank Oz. You won't be disappointed - it's HILARIOUS. |
|
|
| HAY ROB!!11!1! |
[Aug. 30th, 2007|03:59 pm] |
|
LOOK I R UPDATING TO TEH BLOGOSPHERE LOLSZ!!1 |
|
|
| Uni results |
[Jul. 5th, 2007|02:26 pm] |
ENGG291 Engineering Fundamentals
Result:46/100 Pass Conceded (w00t, I got through one boring piece of crap subject)
ECTE233 Digital Hardware 1
Result:61/100 Pass (damnit, I enjoyed that one and I thought I was going to get a Credit. I was close, though)
So anyway, looks like I'll be continuing with my course, at least for this semester. Let's see if I can pass maths 3rd time 'round! |
|
|
| (no subject) |
[Jun. 12th, 2007|09:23 am] |
Which Black Books Character Are You?
But I wanted to be Fran's sleazy landlord..."No no, there's two types of asbestos - there's bad asbestos, and there's nice asbestos!" |
|
|
| (no subject) |
[Jun. 6th, 2007|12:00 am] |
Tonight Dad took me to the movies to see 'Romulus, My Father'.
It is a very moving film and I really enjoyed it. It puts a lot of things we have today into perspective, and gives us a glimpse at the hardships of the immigrants of the post-war years that helped shape Australia as the nation we know and love.
You are doing yourself a disservice by not going to see it. |
|
|
| Stolen from Spally |
[Jun. 4th, 2007|10:25 pm] |
 | You scored as Rugrats,
Rugrats | | 67% | Doug | | 50% | The Adventures of Pete and Pete | | 50% | Kablam! | | 50% | Ren & Stimpy | | 33% | Are You Afraid of the Dark? | | 33% | Legends of the Hidden Temple | | 33% | Clarissa Explains It All | | 25% | Double Dare | | 25% | The Secret World of Alex Mack | | 17% | Rocko's Modern Life | | 8% | </td>
Which Old School Nickelodeon Show Are You?
created with QuizFarm.com |
LIES! I am SO more Rocko's Modern Life than that! |
|
|
| Damnit. |
[Jun. 3rd, 2007|10:19 pm] |
|
I'm addicted to Age of Empires again (again). |
|
|
| (no subject) |
[May. 28th, 2007|05:48 pm] |
|
Trying to drive and eat pizza simultaneously is no mean feat, but I managed to do it (safely) today. I am amazed that I didn't spill the pizza topping all over the car or myself, and for that I am quite pleased. |
|
|
| Stolen from Claire/Dave |
[Apr. 30th, 2007|09:41 am] |
11% are cooler, and
89% are more of a loser than me.
That was unexpected. I certainly think of myself as more of a loser than that. |
|
|
| Wooo! |
[Apr. 30th, 2007|09:32 am] |
So it's April 30, and we all know what day it is...
STEPH'S BIRTHDAY! AND SHE'S 21!!!
This will be a day early for you, Steph, but happy birthday to you anyway. |
|
|
| (no subject) |
[Apr. 29th, 2007|09:51 am] |
93% are more weird,
4% are just as weird, and
3% are more normal than you me!
Whoopty do. |
|
|
| (no subject) |
[Apr. 17th, 2007|10:45 pm] |
|
Dirty Harry is an excellent film. I suggest you rent it. |
|
|
| (no subject) |
[Apr. 3rd, 2007|02:34 pm] |
|
Hehe, it's been exactly one month and 31 minutes since I last posted an entry. |
|
|
| (no subject) |
[Mar. 3rd, 2007|02:03 pm] |
The Everything Test There are many different types of tests on the internet today. Personality tests, purity tests, stereotype tests, political tests. But now, there is one test to rule them all. Traditionally, online tests would ask certain questions about your musical tastes or clothing for a stereotype, your experiences for a purity test, or deep questions for a personality test.We're turning that upside down - all the questions affect all the results, and we've got some innovative results too! Enjoy :-) | Personality | You are more logical than emotional, more concerned about self than concerned about others, more religious than atheist, more dependent than loner, more lazy than workaholic, more traditional than rebel, more engineering mind than artistic mind, more idealist than cynical, more leader than follower, and more extroverted than introverted.
As for specific personality traits, you are adventurious (100%), musical (88%), religious (80%), intellectual (73%). | | | Stereotypes | | College Student | 100% | | Young Professional | 82% | | Old Geezer | 80% | | | | Life Experience | | Sex | 34% | | Substances | 15% | | Travel | 15% | | Politics
Your political views would best be described as Conservative, whom you agree with around 57% of the time. | | Socioeconomic
Your attitude toward life best associates you with Upper Class. You make more than 0% of those who have taken this test, and 88% less than the U.S. average.
| If your life was a movie, it would be rated PG-13.
By the way, your hottness rank is 64%, hotter than 89% of other test takers. | TAKE THE TEST brought to you by thatsurveysite
I'm not too sure about the not caring about others thing, but oh well. |
|
|
| navigation |
| [ |
viewing |
| |
most recent entries |
] |
| [ |
go |
| |
earlier |
] |
| |
|
|
![[info]](http://l-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small}
panich's journal
